![]() If an app you love has been banned from the mainstream app stores, you can still download it on ours because we don't ban apps, period." The Freedom Phone company claims it will do that, saying, "We built our own app store that is completely uncensored. You also need to keep the ecosystem running for years. You need an account system, servers, and a way for developers to upload apps. ![]() the Play Store?Ĭalling up some turnkey manufacturers in China and having them produce a phone isn't a ton of work, but running your own app store is significantly more difficult. The FAQ states, "If the device is already opened, we do not offer returns at this time." Other manufacturers stand behind their products. You'd better really trust this upstart phone manufacturer because if you don't like what you receive, you're out of luck. It actually seems cheaper than that, with a smaller, lower-resolution screen, and a worse camera.Īnyone buying a Freedom Phone is basically doing it sight unseen. If this spec sheet is accurate, we can say that the phone doesn't seem to line up with the $120 Umidigi A9 Pro, though. So much key identifying info has been left off the spec sheet that customers still can't really be sure what they're buying. The battery size is not mentioned at all, and the camera specs appear to be wrong, showing listing three rear cameras when the photos (and hands-on videos) show four rear cameras. What would normally be provided is an SoC manufacturer and model number, like "Qualcomm Snapdragon 888" or "Mediatek Helio P60." Without a model number, we're not learning anything new about the phone. There's a "CPU" listing that says "1.8 GHz 8 Cores," but that's descriptive of most smartphone SoCs on the market. It's very incomplete and missing a lot of the critical information that manufacturers normally provide, so it's not really alleviating any of our concerns. Update: A very incomplete spec sheet has been postedAs of Friday night, the Freedom Phone website updated with a big " specs" link at the top of the page. Plenty of manufacturers publish incomplete teaser pages for upcoming phones, but they don't collect the full retail price from customers without providing detailed spec information first. The front page of the website looks normal, but every button that should say something like "learn more" and link to more information instead says, "Buy it now." There are 10 "buy it now" links placed all over the front of the website-and almost no important information about the phone. ![]() This is a $500 phone, and its website gives you no indication of what you're actually buying. There's the name, a picture, and a price, but there's no spec sheet of any kind. The website lists almost no information about the device itself. ![]() The phone has so many red flags that it's difficult to know where to start. "FreedomOS" is a "free-speech first" operating system that the company claims to have developed, and it says the hardware is "comparable to the best smartphones on the market." Based on the information that Freedom Phone has released so far, almost none of that seems to be true. The company (which seems to also be called "Freedom Phone") claims to have made an "uncensorable app store" that won't ban Gab and Parler the way Google and Apple did. The Freedom Phone's feature set is about what you would expect. Just as we saw with Gab, Parler, and Voat, the Freedom Phone is the latest attempt to build an alternate tech platform for right-wingers, but this time with a smartphone instead of social media. When the phone was announced back in March, its tagline was "a phone made for conservatives, by conservatives." The device is being hawked by Erik Finman, the self-described "world's youngest bitcoin millionaire." The phone is supposed to ship in August. That's the sales pitch for the "Freedom Phone," a $500 smartphone aimed at the MAGA crowd. The course of history would have been altered forever!" If they censor the president, they'll censor anyone. Imagine if Mark Zuckerberg censored MLK or Abraham Lincoln. "Yet they still thought it was OK to ban a sitting president from their platforms. "Nobody elected Mark or Jack to be the arbiters of truth in America," declares a man over a chorus of triumphant horns. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |